---
title: "CAMO.A.150 Findings — Part-CAMO · Avioverse"
description: "After receipt of notification of findings according to point CAMO.B.350, the organisation shall:"
url: "https://avioverse.aero/regulations/easa/continuing-airworthiness/part-camo/section-a-organisation-requirements/camo-a-150"
---

# CAMO.A.150 Findings

Annex Vc (Part-CAMO) · Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

IR Implementing rule

## CAMO.A.150 Findings

(a) After receipt of notification of findings according to point CAMO.B.350, the [organisation](https://avioverse.aero/glossary/easa/organisation) shall:

(1) identify the root cause or causes of and contributing factors to the non-compliance;

(2) define a corrective action plan;

(3) demonstrate corrective action implementation to the satisfaction of the competent authority.

(b) Actions referred to in points (a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3) shall be performed within the period agreed with that competent authority as defined in point CAMO.B.350.

IR · CAMO.A.150 — Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · Regulation (EU) 2019/1383 · Continuing Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

AMC Acceptable means of compliance

## AMC1 CAMO.A.150 Findings

GENERAL

The action plan defined by the [organisation](https://avioverse.aero/glossary/easa/organisation) should address the effects of the non-compliance, as well as its root cause(s) and contributing factor(s).

Depending on the issues, the action plan should address correction/containment of the issue, corrective action and preventive action.

AMC · AMC1 CAMO.A.150 — Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · ED Decision 2020/002/R · Continuing Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

AMC Acceptable means of compliance

## AMC2 CAMO.A.150 Findings

FINDINGS RELATED TO THE CAMO’S MANAGEMENT SYSTEM THAT IS HARMONISED WITH THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF ANOTHER APPROVED [ORGANISATION](https://avioverse.aero/glossary/easa/organisation) If a finding that is raised by the competent authority (or non-compliance that is detected by the compliance monitoring function) affects the harmonisation of the management system of the CAMO with the management system of the contracting operator(s), which is required by point M.A.201(ea), the CAMO should inform the operator(s) to ensure that proper actions are taken within the group. The CAMO and operator(s) should agree on the appropriate channel for such communication.

If the group use common standards to facilitate the harmonisation of the organisations’ management systems, the CAMO should inform the group management board or similar group governance body.

AMC · AMC2 CAMO.A.150 — Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · ED Decision 2022/017/R · Continuing Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

GM Guidance material

## GM1 CAMO.A.150 Findings

CAUSAL ANALYSIS

(a) It is important that the analysis does not primarily focus on establishing who or what caused the non-compliance, but on why it was caused. Establishing the root cause or causes of a non-compliance often requires an overarching view of the events and circumstances that led to it, to identify all the possible systemic and contributing factors (regulatory, human factors (HF), organisational factors, technical, etc.) in addition to the direct factors.

(b) A narrow focus on single events or failures, or the use of a simple, linear model, such as a fault tree, to identify the chain of events that led to the non-compliance, may not properly reflect the complexity of the issue, and therefore there is a risk that important factors that must be addressed in order to prevent a reoccurrence will be ignored.

Such an inappropriate or partial causal analysis often leads to defining ‘quick fixes’ that only address the symptoms of the non-conformity. A peer review of the results of the causal analysis may increase its reliability and objectivity.

(c) A system description of the [organisation](https://avioverse.aero/glossary/easa/organisation) that considers the organisational structures, processes and their interfaces, procedures, staff, equipment, facilities and the environment in which the organisation operates, will support both effective causal (reactive) and hazard (proactive) analyses.

GM · GM1 CAMO.A.150 — Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · ED Decision 2020/002/R · Continuing Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

[All rules in SECTION A — ORGANISATION REQUIREMENTS](https://avioverse.aero/regulations/easa/continuing-airworthiness/part-camo/section-a-organisation-requirements)

Consolidated from the EASA Easy Access Rules (revision 2 Sep 2025, extracted 13 Oct 2026) for convenience. Not the official publication — verify against the Official Journal of the European Union and the EASA publications before operational use.